by David W. Cloud
This article is comprised of p. 12-30 from the booklet, The Transformational Power of Contemporary Praise Music (www.wayoflife.org)
Admin’s note: Like some of the other ministers whose articles I have reproduced here (as well as myself), David Cloud immersed himself in rock’n’roll in his youth, and was later converted. His analysis of the unhealthy elements of Contemporary Christian Music, is incisive and accurate.

Having studied Contemporary Christian Music since the 1970s, I have identified six elements of the music that work together to create the sensual experience sought by contemporary worshipers.

1. Syncopated Dance Rhythm

Irwin Silber, a communist who desired the see social degeneration that would overthrow the “old order,” observed that rock music has this power and it lies in its backbeat rhythm. He wrote:

The great strength of rock & roll lies in its beat. It is a music that is basically sexual, unpuritan. (Sing Out, May 1965).

I can concur with this statement, along with thousands of others who have been “transformed” by the power of rock & roll music. It was the “beat” of rock that reached into a Christian home and captured my heart and soul as a teenager in the early 1960s. I can testify that the influence was indeed “basically sexual, unpuritan.”

And the heavily syncopated rhythm, the rhythm that literally grabs the body and encourages it to move in a modern dance fashion, is a major part of the contemporary worship experience.

The heavily syncopated rhythm is what has always made rock & roll sensual party music. That’s its very essence. John Makujina says,

Rock’s danceability is due predominately to its emphasized syncopated rhythms. (Measuring the Music)

The very name rock & roll was a euphemism for fornication. Since the 1950s, the phrase “let’s rock” has meant “let’s party, let’s drink, let’s get high, let’s do as we very well please.”

Rock music has always been about living as you please and thumbing your nose at authorities. It was summarized by The Rolling Stones in 1965:

I’m free to do what I want any old time.

And by The Animals:

It’s my life and I’ll do what I want
It’s my mind, and I’ll think what I want.

And by The Mamas and Papas:

You got to go where you want to go
do what you want to do.

And by The Isley Brothers:

It’s your thing
do what you want to do.

And this licentious anti-God philosophy has been driven by the heavy dance syncopation.

Graham West, a pastor in Australia who has a background in writing, recording, and producing pop music, says,

When you take away the accent from where the strong beat should fall the human body is instinctively inclined to move into the gap and mark where the missing accent should be. (video presentation The Rhythm of Rock)

Some common types of syncopated dance rhythm are the back beat, the silent beat, the staccato beat, and beat anticipation.

a) The Backbeat
The backbeat, which rockers and social commentators have identified as “sexy,” has been the chief characteristic of worldly dance music since the beginning of the 20th century. It was the rhythm that drove ragtime, the blues, boogie woogie, jazz, big band swing, and honky tonk or Western swing.

Fifties rocker Bill Haley said:

I felt that if I could take a tune and drop the first and third beats and accentuate the second and fourth, and add a beat the listeners could clap to as well as dance this would be what they were after.

Indeed, it was! The backbeat drove a virtual revolution.

The backbeat emphasizes the offbeat, such as

one-TWO-three-FOUR

The backbeat is in contrast to the straight or march beat, which has the emphasis on the first beat or every beat equally:

one-two-three-four, one-two-three-four

or

ONE-two-three-four, ONE-two-three-four

b) The Silent Beat
The silent beat is another type of syncopated dance rhythm. By simply dropping a beat, a sensual rock effect is created

Da Da Da Da, Da Da Da Da

vs.

Da Da — Da, Da Da — Da

c) The Staccato Beat
In the staccato beat the notes are clipped.

Da Da Da Da, Da Da Da Da

vs.

Dop Dop Dop Dop, Dop Dop Dop Dop

d) Beat Anticipation
Beat anticipation, as Graham West explains in his video presentation The Rhythm of Rock, is a type of syncopation that falls at the end of a phrase and is unresolved; it is as much a major element of rock as the backbeat. It can create the jerky rock feel even when the other types of syncopation aren’t present. It leaves the listener anticipating something that is not there and the body wants to fill in the gap.

Beat anticipation is a major part of contemporary worship music, and fundamentalist churches that are “adapting” contemporary worship songs are typically buying into the beat anticipation, not understanding that they are actually performing soft rock ballads. They think that since they don’t have drums and a bass guitar thumping out a heavy backbeat that they have removed the rock from Christian rock, but nothing could be farther from the truth.

The backbeat, the silent beat, the staccato beat, and beat anticipation are some of the many kinds of off beat dance syncopation that go into the creation of rock.

The Rhythm Bible has

…over 1,000 examples of rhythmic figures common in jazz, rock, Latin, blues, funk, and other styles–rhythms that make contemporary sounds so exciting.

The point is that rock is made up of many types of syncopation, but they all have the same type of effect on the body. Whether rock is soft or hard, quiet or loud is irrelevant. It matters not if it is played in an electric bass guitar or a piano. It moves the body and makes you want to dance.

The heavy syncopation is why pop music is so physical.

Jimi Hendrix said this of his music:

Perhaps it is sexy…but what music with a big beat isn’t? (David Henderson, ‘Scuse Me While I Kiss the Sky: The Life of Jimi Hendrix, p. 117)

Gene Simmons of Kiss said,

That’s what rock is all about—sex with a 100 megaton bomb, the beat! (Entertainment Tonight, ABC, Dec. 10, 1987)

Describing how she felt when attending her first big rock concert, Janis Joplin said:

I couldn’t believe it, all that rhythm and power. I got stoned just feeling it, like it was the best Dope in the world. It was so sensual, so vibrant, loud, crazy. (Joel Dreyfuss, Janis Joplin Followed the Script, Wichita Eagle, Oct. 6, 1970, p. 7A)

The sensual dance rhythm of rock music has addictive, transformative power.

Dan Lucarini, a former contemporary worship leader, led churches from using traditional hymns to a contemporary worship program, and in the book Why I Left the Contemporary Christian Music Movement he describes how he did it. The key was starting out with “soft” rock, which acts as an addictive, transformative influence on the congregation. He writes:

The rock was softer, but it still contained the rock rhythm that undeniably appeals to our flesh. The listener soon develops a craving for it. Just like an addict, there is no turning back. What happens over time is a steady slide down the slippery slope away from all traditional music into the latest, edgiest contemporary styles.

Graham West, formerly associated with the pop music industry, issues the same warning:

Once you begin listening to soft rock, you begin sliding down that slippery slope to the more aggressive forms of rock. Soft Rock begins to orient the whole way of perceiving music around rhythm and away from melody. Your musical interest will change. Hymns will seem dull in comparison to your newly acquired tastes. It’s a progression I’ve seen over and over again in the lives of Christians. It’s a downward spiral. It happens in the lives of individuals; it happens in the lives of families; it happens in the lives of churches.

There is a gray area of ignorance about the power of Pop syncopation. And the devil, taking advantage of this, being not only the master musician but also the master of subtlety, comes along to a strong fundamental church or a Bible college and he offers his wares of Contemporary Christian rock ballads. It sounds great. There’s no drums, no wild electric guitars, no obvious back beat, just the piano or guitar and the singer. And it’s almost the same as the songs that they used to sing, except the rhythm kind of trips a little bit. But that’s O.K. because it’s exciting, and the young people love it.

The problem is that when the rhythm does that little trip it means that the music contains a basic, distinctive rhythmic feature of all rock & roll since its inception in the 1950s. In this way, before you’ve even known it, you’ve been deceived by the subtle strategy of Satan. This is the blind spot that Satan is using to his advantage. He knows that once a church accepts rock ballads, complete capitulation is almost inevitable.

In the case of vigilant, serious-minded Christians, he has to start them up at the very top of the slope with very gentle rock so that the conscience doesn’t scream out, “This music is wrong!” Just as long as he can get you started, he has won, because just like a drug pusher he knows that his users will want more and more of that sensual rhythm. (Graham West, The Rhythm of Rock)

Many churches that are adapting Contemporary Christian Music think they are removing the “rock” from Christian rock, but they are actually just toning it down to “soft rock”….

2. Unresolving Chord Cadence

Another major element of the sensual contemporary worship experience is the unresolving chords.

Contemporary worship music tends to use a chord cadence other than the “perfect” or “authentic” cadence, which is used by the old hymns and which resolves back to the first tone. A “weak cadence” or an “imperfect cadence” does not resolve in this way. It is always more “feely.”

Pastor Tim Kelly of Maine has taught music theory for almost 25 years and was previously deeply involved in the pop, rock, new country rock, rap, R&B music culture. He makes the following observation about contemporary praise music:

The emphasis is on the IV chord. The V chord is always called the dominant chord in music, but in Contemporary Christian Music it is avoided as often as possible. It doesn’t resolve. Music works like this: You have a question (phrase) and then an answer (phrase). There is tension and then release (resolve). Contemporary praise music seems to present questions with no answers, no absolutes. It is wispy and draws on the emotions, with no intellectual purpose or guide. This is the philosophy of the Devil.

3. Sensual Vocal Styles

Another major element of the contemporary worship experience is the sensual vocal techniques that have been borrowed from the morally corrupt pop music field.

a) Breathy Style
There is the Breathy Style, in which the microphone is held extremely close to the singer’s mouth. This gives a feeling of intimacy and sexuality. Elvis Presley and other pop sex god “crooners” used this technique to great effect, and contemporary Christian musicians follow this pattern.

b) Scooping and Sliding
Then there is Scooping and Sliding, by which instead of hitting the note cleanly and directly, there is a slide from above or below its true pitch. It adds a great sensuality to the music.

The 1950’s book How to Sing for Money said,

Scooping is a common practice…as a swing effect.
Thus, the scooping technique was created as part of the commercial dance music scene, and it works with the syncopated rhythm to create the sensual atmosphere that dancers desire. It is a technique that fits the night club, the bar, the gambling den.

But it has been adapted by contemporary Christian musicians and Southern Gospel performers.

These styles are not only sensual, they draw attention to the singer, which is another major element of both secular pop and contemporary Christian music.

4. Electronic Modulation

Sometimes contemporary praise is performed with acoustic instruments only, but typically it incorporates full-blown and very loud electronic instruments with reverberation, echo, feedback and other types of electronic modulation. This is used to intensify the sensuality of the music and to create a mystical atmosphere.

5. The Rise and Fall of the Intensity of the Music

A contemporary worship experience typically involves a dramatic rise and fall in the sound level and intensity of the music. This is used to create an emotional roller coaster. One minute you’re body is twisting and jerking to earsplitting rock & roll and the next minute you are immersed in a near trance-inducing atmosphere in which the music is toned down and less physically demanding but more mystical.

6. Repetition

Repetition is another major element of the contemporary worship experience. Because of the repetition, Contemporary Christian Music has been called “7/11 music”–seven words sung 11 times.

Actually, the repetition can be much more extensive than that. In Kevin Prosch’s song Signs and Wonders, the words “signs and wonders, healings, deliverance” are repeated at least 20 times and the words “the kingdom of God is here” are repeated at least 25 times.

At the 1996 Heart of David conference, they sang Prosch’s Praise the Lord, Oh My Soul for 20 minutes, and they sang another song for over three hours! That must be the epitome of contemporary repetition!

This music is indeed transformational. By yielding to it, the Contemporary Christian Music crowd is carried along into a “tangible experience.” When combined with the syncopated, body-jerking rhythms, the electronic modulation, the unresolving chord progression, the rise and fall of the intensity, and the sensual vocal styles, the repetition can have a hypnotic effect on those who yield themselves unreservedly to the experience.

download


PDF  ODT

4 Comments on Major Elements of the Contemporary Worship Experience

  1. Paul Goodwin says:

    I arrived here for your article on four part harmony, which I enjoyed. Thank you for that.

    I don’t know how long ago this article was written? Would you consider looking again at these things in light of recent Christian experience?
    Would you look up Jonathan David Helser?
    He is a writer and performer in the modern church scene with synths and stage lighting. He sings with his wife and a small team. His most famous song is “No longer slaves”. His style is gentle rather than heavy beat based. His song “Mount Zion” has hardly any beat.
    His father has a testimony. He had been a rock musician in his youth and had abused his body in those days. He came to Christ and put all that down. He and his wife had no children and he did not want any because he was afraid that the baby would be deformed in some way as he had wrecked his body. However, he received a prophetic word telling him that God had “healed your seed” and “he would play the harp and the whole world would sing his songs”. (iirc) So was born his son Jonathan.

    Do you see how much grace there is? Look again.

  2. pp2300 says:

    Paul,
    I did look up the person you mentioned, and watched a few music videos. The story about his father was impressive, I have heard a similar story from at least one other Christian music artist.
    When I was young, I immersed myself in Rock music, and even played in a band for a year or so in my early 20’s. When I became a Christian, I put that music behind me (not all at once, but step by step). I kept thinking and studying to try and understand why this modern music has such an appeal and effect on people, and how it developed.
    I’ve come to the conclusion that it was a deviation in the use of rhythm that started around the time of ragtime music, which led us to where we are today. Of course, other elements of music have likewise been misused, but rhythm was the foundational element. Rather than launch into a large explanation, I will give you a simple example.
    Put your hand on your heart. What do you feel? It should be a regular beat, so quiet that it is rather implied than stated. When you exercise, this beat gets faster, and louder, but it is still regular. If you’ve ever had an irregular heartbeat (I have, on a few occasions) it is very disturbing and disquieting. This is only one rhythmic cycle in the body, there are many others, such as brain waves, breathing patterns, patterns in digestion, etc. In a well-functioning body, the rhythmic patterns are regular and steady, and good music will be a reflection of that, and its influence on the body will be to reinforce and strengthen the healthy cycles.
    When a person is first exposed to music that disturbs the regular rhythmic patterns, by playing off the beat, emphasizing the weak beat, or any of the various methods outlined in the article above, they have three choices: run away from it (flight), resist it (fight), or let it control (succumb). When you succumb to it, you allow something to control you which is irregular. It’s influence on the mind and body can only be to strengthen irregularity. By breaking down the natural laws, the way is paved to break down the moral laws.
    There are, however, great feelings associated with broken laws. If I seduce my neighbors wife, or rob my way into being a millionaire, or experiment with drugs, there are undoubtedly some strong initial “good feelings” associated with these kinds of acts. But the end result is ruin. That is why I avoid music which I believe is built on disregard of laws.

  3. Sofie Berg says:

    I read this article with great pleasure and interest, and between the personal statements there was a lot of interesting information (I Googled “typical traits for Worship music” and landed on this page). Besides the description of syncopated beats and traits I became a little surprised by the negative angle and view of becoming drawn into the music because of the rhythm and traits.
    This for example; “ When you succumb to it, you allow something to control you which is irregular. It’s influence on the mind and body can only be to strengthen irregularity. By breaking down the natural laws, the way is paved to break down the moral laws.” This sentence kind of concludes the whole article, it’s the explanation to the negative views and even satan is visiting- because of this very short and simple statement that “the influence on the mind and body can only be to strengthen irregularity”. Can? Or will? Is this an opinion or is it verified, scientifically proven? Then you compare the good feelings with other sins and claim that they give the same feeling. I can only speak for me, but there’s a huge difference between how I feel when I let myself drift away in music, and when I do something that is morally wrong and/or illegal. If I stole a chocolate when I was a kid I felt terrible about it, but I did it with poor impulse control because of age. Music has always been chosen by me- not by impulse, but because of its ability and power to let me think more clearly and be more focused. It provides a way of dealing with emotions, reminding me that I’m not alone, it calms me down when needed and gives me extra courage- and most of all I feel closest to God when I’m in the flow zone. It doesn’t matter how I do it, what matters is that I do, and it serves a positive, grounding effect, and everything that makes me grow as a human is a healing purpose.

  4. practic2300 says:

    Sofie, this article, and others like it, that I have included here, were put there mainly for people who experienced the ability of modern music to drive the passions of human nature into sin, and were interested in trying to understand how it was that this music worked on the human nature, so they could avoid those elements. Of course, we could try to define the perfect rules of music and then write and play music after these “perfect rules” and we would still not come up to God’s standard. Although God works according to law, we do not reach God by the manipulation of law.

    “The law is our schoolmaster to bring us to Christ.” It does this by revealing sin. You knew it was wrong to steal chocolate as a child, but you only knew because you learned that stealing was wrong. The law taught you that, either through the Bible, a human teacher, or observation of the laws of nature.

    But simply revealing the wrong is not the end aim. The aim is to lead to Christ, to lead to something better. For a Christian, the aim is to have Christ’s life planted within, and then to learn cooperation with God, so that this life can grow and manifest itself, without our interference, and without our attempts to control God’s working for our own ends.

    The biggest problem faced by the church in our day is outlined in the message to the Laodicean church: “You say, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and know not that you are wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked.” Revelation 3:17. This feeling of richness does not merely include material goods; it also includes a false spiritual satisfaction. They are, after all, church people, and not merely businessmen of the world. They are satisfied with their spiritual condition, and have stopped searching for truth.

    If you were to ask one of these Laodiceans if they were content with their relationship with God, what would most of them say? It would be something like: “Oh yes, He is everything to me!” And yet, God’s analysis is entirely different. This should make us very cautious and self-distrustful when analyzing our own spiritual experience. When Peter learned not to trust himself, he did not adamantly proclaim his love for Christ, but simply said, “You know that I love You.”

    I once knew a woman who was having great difficulty maintaining a house that she owned, because she lacked the resources. When I suggested that she sell the house, she strongly protested. She proclaimed that the house gave her safety, security, comfort, etc. Her language was similar to the way you described the effect of music upon you.

    I told her that it seemed like she was making the house a bit of an idol, because all the things that she claimed to get from her house, she should have actually gotten directly via a relationship with God. If she had all those things from Him directly, then she would possess them anywhere, whether she owned a house or not. If she was put in a dungeon, then as long as she had God’s presence, she would not be cast down or discouraged, but would feel just as safe, secure, and comforted, as she felt in a normal house.

    I would say something similar regarding music. When music is an expression of a true relationship with God (not the false relationship that the Laodicean imagines he has), then it will find its proper place. This kind of experience requires great effort: only those who search for truth as for hid treasure, will find it. But as long as people put houses, music, experiences, feelings, or any other earthly thing, in the place of God, even though they may claim that God works through those things, then they will not find the truth. “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled.”

    One of the main reasons why we would fear to search for truth is that it may expose things in us that we do not want to give up. And so instead we settle for a type of religion or spirituality, that allows us to keep those things, and yet seem like we have God. But this alternate way always involves putting the created things of God above the Creator. We will accept a relationship with God, or God’s working, but only through those things that we enjoy, or through which we derive happiness. So one of the last messages to this world is: “Worship Him that made [all things].” Revelation 14:7. There are many false teachings about God that cause us to be afraid of Him. These must be removed so we can see Him as He truly His. Then we will find our delight in Him and His truth, and then all the gifts of the Creator, of which music is one, will find their proper place.

    I invite you to check out our other website: practicaprophetica.com, where you will find some of these truths unfolded.

Leave a Reply